First programs under 2.0

This forum is for eXpress++ general support.
Message
Author
User avatar
Eugene Lutsenko
Posts: 1649
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:23 am
Location: Russia, Southern federal district, city of Krasnodar
Contact:

Re: First programs under 2.0

#11 Post by Eugene Lutsenko »

Wolfgang Ciriack wrote: Fri Dec 04, 2020 5:32 am You need an update from Xb2.Net.
Wolfgang! Could you remind me of Boris Borzik's email?

User avatar
rdonnay
Site Admin
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:58 pm
Location: Boise, Idaho USA
Contact:

Re: First programs under 2.0

#12 Post by rdonnay »

You will have to rewrite these code snippets without xb2net
Yes, that is correct.
The eXpress train is coming - and it has more cars.

User avatar
Eugene Lutsenko
Posts: 1649
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:23 am
Location: Russia, Southern federal district, city of Krasnodar
Contact:

Re: First programs under 2.0

#13 Post by Eugene Lutsenko »

So I'll do that. And another question. If I completely switch to 2.0, will everything work on w10 and w7?

User avatar
sdenjupol148
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:27 am
Location: NYC

Re: First programs under 2.0

#14 Post by sdenjupol148 »

Hi Eugene,

I have several different software packages at several different clients.
Everything is compiled under 2.0 and my clients have a mixture of Win7 and Win10 machines.
There are no issues; everything works great.

Bobby

User avatar
Eugene Lutsenko
Posts: 1649
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:23 am
Location: Russia, Southern federal district, city of Krasnodar
Contact:

Re: First programs under 2.0

#15 Post by Eugene Lutsenko »

Thank you, SbDrakos, this pleases. Do you also get lists of ch files when compiling? I have never been able to compile a large system (Eidos) that I make for 2.0. Writes that there is no memory. And in 1.9, the same thing is compiled and there is enough memory. I can't make a project file for it. To do this, you need to find out which ch and lib are really necessary for it. I don't know where to get this information

User avatar
Auge_Ohr
Posts: 1405
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:44 pm

Re: First programs under 2.0

#16 Post by Auge_Ohr »

hi,
Eugene Lutsenko wrote: Fri Dec 04, 2020 10:09 pm I have never been able to compile a large system (Eidos) that I make for 2.0. Writes that there is no memory. And in 1.9, the same thing is compiled and there is enough memory. I can't make a project file for it.
why do you think Xbase++ v2.x is "better" for your Code :roll:
Xbase++ will not compile a PRG with 100000 lines ...
Eugene Lutsenko wrote: Fri Dec 04, 2020 10:09 pm To do this, you need to find out which ch and lib are really necessary for it. I don't know where to get this information
AFAIK, your Source must #include *.CH Files else you got "Warnings" when compile with /W
greetings by OHR
Jimmy

User avatar
Eugene Lutsenko
Posts: 1649
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:23 am
Location: Russia, Southern federal district, city of Krasnodar
Contact:

Re: First programs under 2.0

#17 Post by Eugene Lutsenko »

I think 2.0 is better, because it is 10 years newer. Has Alaska done something valuable in 10 years? I hope this will work better under w10. You can also opt out of xb2net, which I can't update. I will make a project for the Eidos system. You just need to block the workbench, otherwise it keeps popping up for something else. The AFAIK command lets you know which ch files to include in the source code? How do I use it?

User avatar
Auge_Ohr
Posts: 1405
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:44 pm

Re: First programs under 2.0

#18 Post by Auge_Ohr »

hi,

it is not the Question if Xbase++ v2.x is better as Xbase++ v1.9x.
it was the Question if it "help" you with your Code :?:

Xbase++ v2.x also will refuse to compile your Code with 100000 lines in 1 x PRG ... NO Compiler will do it :naughty:

---
You just need to block the workbench, otherwise it keeps popping up for something else.
The AFAIK command lets you know which ch files to include in the source code? How do I use it?
you should learn to work in Workbench ...

compile ONE Module until you got not Warnings with /W
search for missing Constant under \INCLUDE to which *.CH it belong ( use TC or HBFM )

i have #include "DcDialog.CH" in each of those 795 *.PRG ... have fun
greetings by OHR
Jimmy

User avatar
rdonnay
Site Admin
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:58 pm
Location: Boise, Idaho USA
Contact:

Re: First programs under 2.0

#19 Post by rdonnay »

Your code will compile faster if you break it down into many smaller .PRG files instead of 1 or 2 large .PRG files.
The eXpress train is coming - and it has more cars.

User avatar
Eugene Lutsenko
Posts: 1649
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:23 am
Location: Russia, Southern federal district, city of Krasnodar
Contact:

Re: First programs under 2.0

#20 Post by Eugene Lutsenko »

Thanks. I understand that. I already manage to make small programs in 2.0 under W10.

Post Reply